I don't believe the way I've set out this fixed effect model is correct for stata
I am using stata 15
The Model I am using the model, as reference:
Array
X represents the time-covariates:
age,
mastat (marital status),
nkids (number of children,
jbstat (job status)
The U is the dummy variables that represents how many years before or after an individual migrates (
Movest)
dependent = happiness ( lfsato)
This is a snippet of the data i have:
input long pid float wave byte(lfsato sex mastat) int age byte(movest nkids) float(lead1 lead2 lead3 lead4 lead5 lag1 lag2 lag3 lag4 lag5)
10017933 6 6 2 5 54 1 0 . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10017933 7 6 2 4 55 1 0 0 . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10017933 8 6 2 4 56 1 0 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10017933 9 3 2 4 56 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0
10017933 10 5 2 4 58 1 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0
10017933 11 . 2 4 59 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10017933 12 5 2 4 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10017933 13 6 2 4 60 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10017933 14 4 2 4 62 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .
10017933 15 6 2 4 63 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . .
10017933 16 5 2 4 64 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . .
10017933 17 6 2 4 65 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . .
10017933 18 6 2 4 66 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . .
10017992 6 5 2 6 17 1 0 . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10017992 7 6 2 6 18 1 0 0 . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10017992 8 5 2 6 19 1 0 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10017992 9 4 2 6 19 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 0 0 0
10017992 10 6 2 6 21 1 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0
10017992 11 . 2 6 22 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10017992 12 5 2 6 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10017992 13 . 2 6 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .
10017992 14 5 2 6 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . .
10017992 15 7 2 6 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . .
10017992 16 4 2 6 27 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . .
10017992 17 5 2 6 28 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . .
10019057 6 . 2 6 64 2 0 . . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10019057 7 6 2 6 65 1 0 1 . . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10019057 8 6 2 6 66 1 0 0 1 . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10019057 9 6 2 6 67 1 0 0 0 1 . . 0 0 0 0 0
10019057 10 5 2 6 67 1 0 0 0 0 1 . 0 0 0 0 0
10019057 11 . 2 6 68 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
10019057 12 5 2 6 69 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10019057 13 . 2 6 71 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10019057 14 6 2 6 71 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .
10019057 15 5 2 6 73 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . .
10019057 16 6 2 6 74 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . .
10019057 17 6 2 6 75 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . .
10019057 18 5 2 6 76 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . .
10023526 6 4 2 4 43 1 0 . . . . . 0 . . . 0
10023526 7 5 2 4 44 1 0 0 . . . . . . . 0 0
10023526 11 . 2 1 48 1 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10023526 12 5 2 4 49 1 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0 0
10023526 13 5 2 4 50 1 0 0 0 . . . 0 0 0 0 0
10023526 14 5 2 4 51 1 0 0 0 0 . . 0 0 0 0 .
10023526 15 5 2 4 52 1 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . .
10023526 16 5 2 4 53 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . .
10023526 17 5 2 4 54 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . .
10023526 18 6 2 4 55 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . .
end
I was using the code
Code:
xtreg lfsato sex mastat age jbstat movest nkids lead1 lead2 lead3 lead4 lead5 lag1 lag2 lag3 lag4 lag5, fe
This is a follow on from:
https://www.statalist.org/forums/for...ational-period