Quantcast
Channel: Statalist
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 73268

Interpretation of interaction term with ologit regression

$
0
0
Hi all,

I have a question about the interpretation of my results, regarding a moderator in an ologit regression.

My IV is 'green attitude', my DV is 'greenbuying' and my moderator is 'ecolabel trust'. Control variables are age and gender.



anew=attitude (towards green products), and can be:
- zero
- low
- medium
- high

gnew= greenbuying (how often you buy green products), and can be:
-1 - never
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6 - every day

tnew=ecolabel trust, and can be:
- zero
- low
- medium
- high

My regression results are:
Code:
. ologit gnew tnew##anew age i.gender 

Iteration 0:   log likelihood = -28944.057  
Iteration 1:   log likelihood = -27348.317  
Iteration 2:   log likelihood = -27259.086  
Iteration 3:   log likelihood = -27251.011  
Iteration 4:   log likelihood =  -27251.01  

Ordered logistic regression                     Number of obs     =     24,623
                                                LR chi2(17)       =    3386.09
                                                Prob > chi2       =     0.0000
Log likelihood =  -27251.01                     Pseudo R2         =     0.0585

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        gnew |      Coef.   Std. Err.      z    P>|z|     [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
        tnew |
          2  |   1.052075   .2152138     4.89   0.000      .630264    1.473887
          3  |   1.304467    .217954     5.99   0.000     .8772846    1.731649
          4  |   .8888412   .2646973     3.36   0.001      .370044    1.407638
             |
        anew |
          2  |   1.321674   .2067314     6.39   0.000     .9164875     1.72686
          3  |   2.480465   .1951027    12.71   0.000     2.098071    2.862859
          4  |   2.955394   .1982461    14.91   0.000     2.566839    3.343949
             |
   tnew#anew |
        low low  |  -.4183916    .251595    -1.66   0.096    -.9115087    .0747256
        low med  |  -.5871072   .2375724    -2.47   0.013    -1.052741   -.1214739
        low high  |  -.4778066   .2409796    -1.98   0.047     -.950118   -.0054952
        med low  |  -.3663611   .2526495    -1.45   0.147    -.8615449    .1288228
        med med  |  -.5181469   .2386876    -2.17   0.030    -.9859659   -.0503279
        med high  |  -.2446669   .2413479    -1.01   0.311    -.7177002    .2283663
        high low  |   .0376205   .3112913     0.12   0.904    -.5724993    .6477403
        high med  |  -.0507737    .286457    -0.18   0.859     -.612219    .5106716
        high high  |   .2414048   .2865594     0.84   0.400    -.3202413    .8030509
             |
         age |   .0080733   .0007564    10.67   0.000     .0065907    .0095559
             |
      gender |
     Female  |   .0491804   .0256802     1.92   0.055    -.0011519    .0995128
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
       /cut1 |   .1818974   .1740457                     -.1592259    .5230208
       /cut2 |   .5712073   .1741778                      .2298251    .9125895
       /cut3 |   1.381783   .1747356                      1.039307    1.724258
       /cut4 |   1.808177    .174998                      1.465188    2.151167
       /cut5 |   4.742743   .1766713                      4.396473    5.089012
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have two questions about this:

My current interpretation is this:
The coefficient of low trust X med attitude is negative and significant at the 5% level. This entails that med attitude has a stronger negative effect on green buying when trust is low compared to when trust is zero.

Is this correct?

Should I form three hypotheses to test for this moderator?

1. The relationship between attitude and behaviour is mediated by trust in eco-labels for consumers rating environmental impact not very important (attitude = low)

2. The relationship between attitude and behaviour is mediated by trust in eco-labels for consumers rating environmental impact fairly important (attitude = med)

3. The relationship between attitude and behaviour is mediated by trust in eco-labels for consumers rating environmental impact very important (attitude = high)

Is it correct that I need 3 seperate hypotheses as attitude can have 4 values?

It would greatly help me if someone can tell me if I am on the right track! I am struggling a bit with moderation in combination with an ologit regression and two categorical variables as I've never done this before. Any help is greatly appreciated!

Kind regards,
Joris

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 73268

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>